I'm a Libertarian, I could care less. Well Pseudo-Libertarian. We need more gun control whether people like it or not. But other than that, people should be free to do what they want as long as it doesn't infringe upon the rights of others.
Not sure you can be a Libertarian and be for gun control. I don't trust the government to not violate my rights in regards to guns, so I don't want them to have a say in it. The "gun control" issue is really a mental health issue in disguise, anyway.
Well, I don't really have a political party (so mixed and contradicting stuff makes up moi), but I lean more towards Libertarian...
Eh, either way the government should have more control over guns. Any old crazy redneck can just own a gun willy nilly, that's not right. But I don't wanna go into politics, mostly because I'm a blonde when it comes to them. 8D
Gun control only leads to more violence. Compare the murder rates of Chicago, IL, a gun ban city, with the murder rates of Kennesaw, GA, where home owners are required to own guns. From 1982-2010, only four people were murdered in Kennesaw, three of which were committed in a "gun-free" zone where no one could protect themselves. People in that town aren't shooting each other up just because they have guns; they're protecting each other. It's hardly the "old crazy rednecks" that are the problem--it's the thugs and gangsters who know they can violate the rights of others because they're the only ones with firepower.
As much as I hate admitting it, you're right. I just don't know anymore. I guess guns shouldn't be banned, but be difficult to obtain and easy to lose. Like, if police or whatever see you mishandling your gun by shooting it into the air or shooting at cans in your backyard, they can take it away from you for misuse. Guns are for personal protection only.
Guns are fine for recreational use, too, so long as they are used on premises where it is legal, or will not cause harm or distress to others (ie, indoor and outdoor shooting ranges, wilderness, private property a safe distance from other residences). So many people misunderstand and over-simplify the purpose of a gun to "bang, you're dead." I used to shoot at cans with my uncle's rifle when I was a little kid. It was one of my favorite things to do when we went out to the countryside, because we can't shoot guns in the city. It taught me how to properly handle a gun, and that it's a very powerful thing which must be used responsibly, and not as a plaything. If we taught all our children about proper gun use and safety, perhaps America's gun culture wouldn't be seeded so deeply in using them strictly for violence. Our culture is the problem when it comes to guns, not the guns themselves.
There are already background checks in place for those who try to purchase guns. The problem is that these background checks do not check against is mental health history. The real way to prevent horrible gun violence is not just restricting felons from owning them, but to prevent the mentally unstable from getting their hands on them, too. But then the ultimate question arises: What would disqualify someone from purchasing or owning a firearm? What illnesses would affect my ability to get a gun? Would we all be subject to psyche evaluations if we have no previous mental health history? What standards would the evaluations be checked against? Would government take it a step further and try to label those with certain political mindsets as mentally unsound? It's like opening up Pandora's box, tempting government to keep trampling all over us.
Ah, your view on guns is different from mine. I just look at a gun and all I think is "It's a weapon I hope is never used." I really don't view guns as anything but weapons, so recreational use with guns (I can't word it any other way, sorry) just seems like a waste to me. Which is completely hypocritical since I want to go hunting with a rifle one day, but oh well.
Ah, gun control debates drive me wild, but you have the right idea. Most people just blather on about the *insert number here* Amendment's right that lets you own a gun. And after hearing what you have to say, I'm going to become neutral to gun control. It's too much of an open field with too many good points on opposite sides. But thanks for your thoughts. Sorry I wasted your time with my wishful thinking though.
Eh, either way the government should have more control over guns. Any old crazy redneck can just own a gun willy nilly, that's not right. But I don't wanna go into politics, mostly because I'm a blonde when it comes to them. 8D
There are already background checks in place for those who try to purchase guns. The problem is that these background checks do not check against is mental health history. The real way to prevent horrible gun violence is not just restricting felons from owning them, but to prevent the mentally unstable from getting their hands on them, too. But then the ultimate question arises: What would disqualify someone from purchasing or owning a firearm? What illnesses would affect my ability to get a gun? Would we all be subject to psyche evaluations if we have no previous mental health history? What standards would the evaluations be checked against? Would government take it a step further and try to label those with certain political mindsets as mentally unsound? It's like opening up Pandora's box, tempting government to keep trampling all over us.
Ah, gun control debates drive me wild, but you have the right idea. Most people just blather on about the *insert number here* Amendment's right that lets you own a gun. And after hearing what you have to say, I'm going to become neutral to gun control. It's too much of an open field with too many good points on opposite sides. But thanks for your thoughts. Sorry I wasted your time with my wishful thinking though.